<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>



<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/">
<title>Joerg talks to himself</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/</link>
<description>joehni</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-19T08:14:44+01:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.661" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001651_write_once_run_anywhere.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001613_movin_movin_.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001500_fooled_by_java_identity.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001340_you_know_youre_married_.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001339_movable_meets_konqueror.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001651_write_once_run_anywhere.html">
<title>Write once run anywhere??</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001651_write_once_run_anywhere.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been a big fan of Java, especially since its promise "Write once, run everywhere" comes very close - at least if you compare the situation with the C/C++ world 8 years ago (and take all the libraries into account).</p>

<p>However, this promise nearly killed my Christmas last year. Ever used the new fancy ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor? Nice class. Easy task handling in a multi-threaded application design (at least if you dont try to extend it, but this is another story). I've developed my application on Windows, we did extensive tests in a Linux environment and when we delivered the application to our customer's location Friday before Christmas it crashed quite instantly. Within the logger! What's that?</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Jörg Schaible</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-19T08:14:44+01:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001613_movin_movin_.html">
<title>Movin&apos;, movin&apos; ...</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001613_movin_movin_.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good and bad news! The good one: We bought a house! The bad one: We have to move! :)</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Home-grown</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Jörg Schaible</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-09-03T23:32:06+01:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001500_fooled_by_java_identity.html">
<title>Fooled by Java identity</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001500_fooled_by_java_identity.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>How often do you imply facts that nowhere have been stated or confirmed? Last week I found myself trapped by such a certainty that revealed to be a false assumption.</p>

<p>Ever asked yourself what you can expect from the values delievered by the JDK's method <code>System.identityHashCode(Object object)
</code>
? My original believe (and I suppose I am not alone here) was that the value reflects somehow the memory address of the given object. Not that I tried to access the object in any obscure way, it was just based on the fact that there are not a lot of more things to assign an identity to an object - implying that identity has something to do with uniqueness for the object's lifetime.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Jörg Schaible</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-01-27T14:55:22+01:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001340_you_know_youre_married_.html">
<title>You know, you&apos;re married ...</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001340_you_know_youre_married_.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever been in the situation, that you thought after painting 3 rooms you're done for a while. Not if you're married with a musician. Just one week later, she saw a "small" reed organ with two manuals, pedal and motor in eBay ... Linda was looking for such a beast for more than a year.</p>

<p>The thing was purchased on the auction, but it was too big to fit in the upper store. So a big wardrope had to give way to stuff the reed organ into the chamber with the piano. But if we remove the wardrope, we also can paint the room ... and the room should have a new basement made of cork anyway ... </p>

<p>OK, all done now and she is happy. And she didn't complain today for me sitting the rest of the evening here at the keyboard :)</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Home-grown</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Jörg Schaible</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-03-19T00:04:59+01:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001339_movable_meets_konqueror.html">
<title>Movable meets Konqueror</title>
<link>http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/joehni/archives/001339_movable_meets_konqueror.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I have not checked this for some long time now, but lately it seems Konqueror and Movable met each other - and I can blog! :))</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Scrapbook</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Jörg Schaible</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-03-18T23:55:51+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
